Method
How we pick
What we look at, where the information comes from, and what we do not claim.
What we compare
Every tool is looked at against the same short list: pricing clarity (what you pay, what is extra and what changes as you grow), invoicing, getting paid (payment methods and their fees), accounting depth, and fit and availability. If a company does not publish something, the page says so instead of guessing.
- Pricing clarityWhat you pay, what is extra, and what changes as you grow.
- InvoicingHow easy it is to create, send and follow up on invoices.
- Getting paidSupported payment methods and the fees that come with them.
- Accounting depthWhat it can do beyond invoicing, and where it stops.
- Fit and availabilityWho it suits best and where it is available.
Sources
We build each comparison from information the companies publish themselves: pricing pages, feature lists and documentation. Every tool entry shows the date we checked it and links to the page the facts came from. Prices are in US dollars as published, and introductory offers are labelled as such because they end.
What we do not claim
Unless a page says otherwise, we have not tested a product hands-on, and we do not publish ratings that imply we did. When we have tested something ourselves, we say so on that page.
“Best for” is our judgment
The facts on each tool come from the company. The short “best for” line is our reading of those facts, not a test result. It is there to help you shortlist, not to replace your own check.
Money and independence
The same criteria apply to every tool whether or not it pays us. The tools are listed alphabetically, and the order is not a ranking. How the site is funded, and which links earn a commission, is explained in the affiliate disclosure.
Spotted a mistake?
Tell us through the contact page and we will check and correct it.